SHAMEFUL VICTIM BLAMING! Chrissie Hynde has made some shocking comments about rape!!!!!

Chrissie Hynde has made some shocking comments about rape: 'If you don't want to entice a rapist, don't wear high heels so you can't run from him'

Courtesy of http://www.ok.co.uk/celebrity-news/chrissie-hynde-rape-comments 

In a Sunday newspaper interview, the star opened up about her own experience of sexual assault.

Chrissie believed that the attack was all her doing because of the way she was dressed and the fact that she was under the influence of drugs.

“If I'm walking around in my underwear and I'm drunk? Who else's fault can it be?," she said.

When suggested that it would be the "guys" fault she responded: “Oh, come on! That's just silly."

“If I'm walking around and I'm very modestly dressed and I'm keeping to myself and someone attacks me, then I'd say that's his fault.

“But if I'm being very lairy and putting it about and being provocative, then you are enticing someone who's already unhinged — don't do that.”

Chrissie added: “You know, if you don't want to entice a rapist, don't wear high heels so you can't run from him. If you're wearing something that says 'Come and ---- me', you'd better be good on your feet… I don't think I'm saying anything controversial am I?"

Billionaire Gets 4 MONTHS For Sexually Assaulting 12-Year-Old Because He’s ‘Productive’

Billionaire Gets 4 MONTHS For Sexually Assaulting 12-Year-Old Because He’s ‘Productive’

Courtesy of http://www.addictinginfo.org/2014/06/07/billionaire-gets-off/

In the United States, it doesn’t matter who you are; if you’re rich, you receive special treatment in our “justice” system.
SC Johnson, the “family” company’s billionaire heir, Samuel Curtis Johnson III, who confessed to repeatedly sexually assaulting his teenage stepdaughter has received an outrageous prison sentence of only four months because the judge, Circuit Justice Eugene Gasiorkiewicz, feels that Johnson’s importance to the community is valued much higher than the dignity of his abused step-daughter. 
You read that right. Affluenza, as it has been dubbed, has struck again. This billionaire has officially plead guilty to mere misdemeanor charges of fourth-degree sexual assault and disorderly conduct instead of receiving the maximum which is felony sexual assault on a minor child. These charges originally stem from 2011. Think Progress reported Johnson’s stepdaughter “initially told police Johnson was ‘a sex addict‘ and touched her inappropriately 15 to 20 times starting when she was 12 years old. She told her mother about the abuse in order to protect her younger sister, and Johnson confessed when the mother confronted him.” Because Johnson’s victim was unwilling to testify in the case, the prosecutors had to make a plea deal with Johnson and his legal team. 

Johnson’s attorney, Michael F. Hart argued to Judge Gasiorkiewicz that the maximum prison term for his client was not fair and that is should be reserved for “maximum defendants,” people unlike his client (aka not billionaires with a prestigious name), who has no prior record and who leads a “productive life.” Again, the billionaire status and famous name apply to that “productive life.” He’s an heir, so remember folks, he’s inheriting this empire and inheriting this money. Very productive. 
Add insult to injury, the judge made his decision based on other cases in which he has rarely gives first time offenders the maximum sentence. So instead the judge gave Johnson, a billionaire, a fine of $6,000. The judge ruled that he must serve at least 60 days of the sentence before he will be eligible for release.
Billionaire rapes an underage child, gets a sentence that a teenager gets for shoplifting. That’s what some people like to call the “invisible hand” in economics.
Affluenza is spreading, and it is spreading fast. Just last year, a Washington state judge failed to sentence Shaun Goodman, arrested for his 7th DUI (who, while going over 100 mph, crash into both a parked car and house), to any jail time. The reason? He was a local businessman, a rich businessman, and giving him jail time even after his 7th DUI “wouldn’t be fair for him,” as per the words of Judge James Dixon. Dixon brazenly violated the sentencing guidelines for DUI offenders, but that doesn’t matter when the person facing the crime is of an upper class and owns a business. 
Now who could forget the smug little punk Ethan Couch, the Texas teen who killed four people in a drunk driving accident who got only 10 years’ probation? Because of his rich, elite status, his attorney argued that because he was raised in such affluent circumstances, he failed to grasp the concept of his negative actions and thus couldn’t be held responsible for his actions. Never mind that he plowed his car into four people and savagely murdered them. Never mind that after he realized what had happened he ran and left the scene. All that doesn’t matter. In the eyes of Texas District Judge Jean Boyd, this teen never faced jail time. Instead, he was given the luxury to attend a very expensive, very prestigious rehab center. Guess who is picking up the bulk of that rehab cost? Not his rich parents. Thanks to the taxpayers of the great state of Texas, Couch’s rehab bill has been dropped from $438,000 annually to only $13,870. Congrats, Taxpayers, you picked up 68% of the cost for a rich teen who got out of manslaughter charges simply because he was rich. America! 
And, how about one to really make your blood boil. A trust fund baby, Robert H. Richards IV, who owns, among other things, a $1.8 million dollar mansion near the Winterthur Museum, Garden and Library, had his sentence of 8 years in prison for raping his daughter repeatedly between the ages of 3 and 5 as well as molesting his son starting at the age of 19 months, reduced. The reason? Superior Court Judge Jan Jurden didn’t think the rapist would not “fare in a level 5 prison.” Well that’s the point. It will let them learn from their mistakes while they sit and think about what it is they have done. 
Remember their names:

• Circuit Justice Eugene Gasiorkiewicz
• Judge James Dixon
• Texas District Judge Jean Boyd
• Superior Court Judge Jan Jurden

These are the judges, among a multitude, who have let justice slip through the cracks because the men facing them happened to rich and elite. Maybe they should have their bank accounts investigated. Personally, now I will never buy from SC Johnson again. I suggest some of you take the same route. Boycott SC Johnson, and boycott activist judges who let the rich get away with rape, murder, and sexual assault. 

In the United States, it doesn’t matter who you are; if you’re rich, you receive special treatment in our “justice” system.
SC Johnson, the “family” company’s billionaire heir, Samuel Curtis Johnson III, who confessed to repeatedly sexually assaulting his teenage stepdaughter has received an outrageous prison sentence of only four months because the judge, Circuit Justice Eugene Gasiorkiewicz, feels that Johnson’s importance to the community is valued much higher than the dignity of his abused step-daughter. 
You read that right. Affluenza, as it has been dubbed, has struck again. This billionaire has officially plead guilty to mere misdemeanor charges of fourth-degree sexual assault and disorderly conduct instead of receiving the maximum which is felony sexual assault on a minor child. These charges originally stem from 2011. Think Progress reported Johnson’s stepdaughter “initially told police Johnson was ‘a sex addict‘ and touched her inappropriately 15 to 20 times starting when she was 12 years old. She told her mother about the abuse in order to protect her younger sister, and Johnson confessed when the mother confronted him.” Because Johnson’s victim was unwilling to testify in the case, the prosecutors had to make a plea deal with Johnson and his legal team. 
Johnson’s attorney, Michael F. Hart argued to Judge Gasiorkiewicz that the maximum prison term for his client was not fair and that is should be reserved for “maximum defendants,” people unlike his client (aka not billionaires with a prestigious name), who has no prior record and who leads a “productive life.” Again, the billionaire status and famous name apply to that “productive life.” He’s an heir, so remember folks, he’s inheriting this empire and inheriting this money. Very productive. 
Add insult to injury, the judge made his decision based on other cases in which he has rarely gives first time offenders the maximum sentence. So instead the judge gave Johnson, a billionaire, a fine of $6,000. The judge ruled that he must serve at least 60 days of the sentence before he will be eligible for release.
Billionaire rapes an underage child, gets a sentence that a teenager gets for shoplifting. That’s what some people like to call the “invisible hand” in economics.
Affluenza is spreading, and it is spreading fast. Just last year, a Washington state judge failed to sentence Shaun Goodman, arrested for his 7th DUI (who, while going over 100 mph, crash into both a parked car and house), to any jail time. The reason? He was a local businessman, a rich businessman, and giving him jail time even after his 7th DUI “wouldn’t be fair for him,” as per the words of Judge James Dixon. Dixon brazenly violated the sentencing guidelines for DUI offenders, but that doesn’t matter when the person facing the crime is of an upper class and owns a business. 
Now who could forget the smug little punk Ethan Couch, the Texas teen who killed four people in a drunk driving accident who got only 10 years’ probation? Because of his rich, elite status, his attorney argued that because he was raised in such affluent circumstances, he failed to grasp the concept of his negative actions and thus couldn’t be held responsible for his actions. Never mind that he plowed his car into four people and savagely murdered them. Never mind that after he realized what had happened he ran and left the scene. All that doesn’t matter. In the eyes of Texas District Judge Jean Boyd, this teen never faced jail time. Instead, he was given the luxury to attend a very expensive, very prestigious rehab center. Guess who is picking up the bulk of that rehab cost? Not his rich parents. Thanks to the taxpayers of the great state of Texas, Couch’s rehab bill has been dropped from $438,000 annually to only $13,870. Congrats, Taxpayers, you picked up 68% of the cost for a rich teen who got out of manslaughter charges simply because he was rich. America! 
And, how about one to really make your blood boil. A trust fund baby, Robert H. Richards IV, who owns, among other things, a $1.8 million dollar mansion near the Winterthur Museum, Garden and Library, had his sentence of 8 years in prison for raping his daughter repeatedly between the ages of 3 and 5 as well as molesting his son starting at the age of 19 months, reduced. The reason? Superior Court Judge Jan Jurden didn’t think the rapist would not “fare in a level 5 prison.” Well that’s the point. It will let them learn from their mistakes while they sit and think about what it is they have done. 
Remember their names:

• Circuit Justice Eugene Gasiorkiewicz
• Judge James Dixon
• Texas District Judge Jean Boyd
• Superior Court Judge Jan Jurden

These are the judges, among a multitude, who have let justice slip through the cracks because the men facing them happened to rich and elite. Maybe they should have their bank accounts investigated. Personally, now I will never buy from SC Johnson again. I suggest some of you take the same route. Boycott SC Johnson, and boycott activist judges who let the rich get away with rape, murder, and sexual assault. 

27th June London: Anti child abuse rally - "Victims & Survivors Unite - Breaking The Cycle Of Abuse"

Anti child abuse rally - "Victims & Survivors Unite - Breaking The Cycle Of Abuse"

 

https://www.facebook.com/events/836299693090154/

 

Public · Hosted by Chris Wittwer and Chris Tuck

 

27 June at 13:00–16:00 in UTC+01

 

Richmond Terrace London - Directly Opposite Downing Street

 

A stage & PA system will be set up on the grass of Richmond Terrace directly opposite Downing street to allow survivors & guests to speak

This rally is an 'official' rally & has been granted approval by the relevant councils & police

ALL groups, campaigners and members of the public are welcome to attend

We will be updating this events page with information throughout the run-up to the rally

NOW is the time to make a stand and for our voices to be heard!

Organized by Chris Tuck of http://www.survivors-of-abuse.com/
...
& Chris Wittwer of http://ukpaedos-exposed.com/

After this rally, the whole country will hear the survivors voice - We will make sure of that - WE will NO longer be the forgotten ones

Please only click 'going' if you fully intend on actual going so we can gauge correct numbers & dont forget to invite your friends and share - Thank you

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vile and depraved UK gang raped and abused babies

Vile and depraved UK gang raped and abused babies

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-32413502

Members of a paedophile network whose crimes were described as the most "vile and depraved" police had seen have been convicted of arranging abuse.

The UK-wide gang raped and abused babies and young children, streaming the attacks online to fellow members.
John Denham, 49, and Matthew Stansfield, 34, had denied plotting sex crimes against the victims.
They were found guilty after a trial at Bristol Crown Court. Five other members had earlier admitted various offences.
The group used the internet to plan and stream abuse and tried to groom pregnant women in order to find new victims, the trial heard.


In one case, they groomed a mother and father before their child was born.
Officers from the National Crime Agency, which led the investigation, said the crimes were the most "vile and depraved" it had ever investigated.
Earlier, a jury convicted former actor Denham, 49, from Wiltshire - previously known as Benjamin Harrop - of conspiracy to sexually assault a child under 13.
Stansfield, 34, from Hampshire, was found guilty of conspiracy to rape a child under 13. Denham was cleared of the same charge.
Five others pleaded guilty to offences including rape of a child and conspiracy to rape at an earlier hearing. They are:

• Robin Hollyson, 30, from Bedfordshire
• Christopher Knight, 35, from Manchester
• David Harsley, 51, from Hull
• Matthew Lisk, 32, from East Sussex
• Adam Toms, 33, from Somerset

A date is yet to be set for their sentencing.
The investigation identified three victims - a baby, a toddler and a young child - who were raped and assaulted by the men who had gained the trust of unsuspecting parents.
They met online and were prepared to drive for hours to carry out abuse when an opportunity became available, police said.
The gang also discussed the drugging of children and used video conferencing websites to broadcast the abuse to fellow members.
Police believe there were other victims, and have put measures in place to protect another 21 children found to be at risk.
Despite the men's efforts to destroy evidence, police were able to retrieve webchats where the gang discussed their plans, with comments such as "I'm really in to v.v. young", and "sicker the better".

'Abhorrent fantasies'

Material which could lead to the arrest of other paedophiles has been sent on to police forces on five continents.
Prosecutor Robert Davies told the jury in the Denham and Stansfield trial: "This prosecution will take you into a world you wished did not exist.
"The evidence exposes the shocking interest a group of men had in sexually abusing babies, toddlers or pre-school children.
"A real baby was for certain abused and raped by some of those involved."
Earlier in the trial, Denham told the court he had become "desensitised" after watching a young teenage girl performing a sex act on a man, and the age range "dropped lower and lower".
He said he was "ashamed" of deriving sexual gratification from child pornography and now understood there were "real victims".
The NSPCC has described the case as "vile" and is running a helpline for anyone worried their child may have been a victim.
"These men shared their abhorrent fantasies and honed in on very young children for sickening abuse, on easily accessible sections of the internet," a spokesman said.
"They even callously targeted pregnant women.
"It shows that there is still a long way to go for technology companies and social media networks who work with police to identify and prevent these crimes."

OC Judge causes public outcry after reducing sentence of child rapist

O.C. judge's reduced sentence in child sex assault case sparks a public outcry, calls for him to step down

Courtesy http://www.ocregister.com/articles/judge-657101-kelly-sentence.html

SANTA ANA – An Orange County Superior Court judge’s reduced sentence for a man who was convicted of sexually assaulting a 3-year-old girl has sparked public outrage, a petition and calls for the judge to step down.

Kevin Jonas Rojano-Nieto, 20, was convicted in December of sodomizing a 3-year-old relative and faced a mandatory minimum sentence of 25 years-to-life in prison. But in court on Friday, Judge M. Marc Kelly determined that the punishment in this case was unconstitutional and reduced the sentence to 10 years in prison.

Rojano-Nieto sexually assaulted the girl last year after she wandered into a Santa Ana garage where he was playing video games, prosecutors said. The assault came to light when the girl later complained of pain and her mother noticed that she was injured.

While the crime was “serious and despicable,” it does not compare to a situation where a pedophile preys on an innocent child, the judge said at the sentencing.

The defendant “did not seek out or stalk” the victim, the judge said.

“He was playing video games and she wandered into the garage. He inexplicably became sexually aroused but did not appear to consciously intend to harm (the victim) when he sexually assaulted her. As noted by defense, in an instant, he reacted to a sexual urge and stopped almost immediately,” Kelly said.

“There was no violence or callous disregard for (the victim’s) well-being,” Kelly said.

The judge noted that Rojano-Nieto was raised in a dysfunctional family environment and has shown “extreme remorse” for his actions.

While Kelly agreed that in most circumstances a sentence of 25 years to life would be appropriate, in this case, he said, it would amount to “cruel and unusual punishment.”

The outcry has been swift.

Chicago resident Sara Flores launched an online petition at change.org calling for an apology from Kelly and asking officials to appeal the case. The petition had more than 4,400 signatures as of Tuesday night.

“Judge Kelly’s statements are nothing short of reprehensible,” Flores wrote. “It is clear that Judge Kelly’s empathy towards the perpetrator of this horrific crime has clouded his judgment.”

And multiple Facebook pages have been created, including one called “Remove Judge M. Marc Kelly from the Bench” that generated more than 2,200 “likes” in less than a day.

Rojano-Nieto’s attorney, Erfan Puthawala, could not immediately be reached for comment on Tuesday. In court documents, Puthawala said the mandatory sentence would be “grossly disproportionate” given the facts of the case and Rojano-Nieto’s psychological state.

“It would be an action so far afield from the bounds of justice that to do so would shock the conscience,” Puthawala said. “Society will not be served if Kevin is incarcerated for the next 25 years.”

But an unidentified Facebook commentator said: “Apparently, by walking into the garage, the little girl was asking for it. This needs to stop. Victim blaming a toddler is insanity.”

The District Attorney’s Office said it disagrees with the sentence and is exploring its legal options.

Kelly was appointed by Gov. Gray Davis in 2000. He could not be reached for comment Tuesday.

City News Service

contributed to this report.

Contact the writer: kpuente@ocregister.com

Church pastor found guilty of sexual assaults on women and children in Scotland!

Stirling Agape Church 'Prophet' guilty of sex attacks on women and children

Courtesy of http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-tayside-central-32487571

Walter Masocha was known by church members as "The Prophet", "The Apostle" and "Man of God"

A church leader who called himself "The Prophet" has been convicted of molesting members of his own flock.

Walter Masocha, founder and Archbishop of the Stirling-based Agape for All Nations Church, was found guilty of sexual assault following a trial.
The 51-year-old was convicted of putting his hand down a schoolgirl's trousers, claiming he was driving away demons, and groping a deaconess while praying for her stomach complaint.
He will be sentenced on 19 May.
Both women were targeted at Masocha's seven-bedroom mansion, Coseyneuk House, near Stirling, where the Zimbabwe-born churchman regularly received followers.

During a six-day trial at Falkirk Sheriff Court, the 15-year-old girl said many in the church regarded Masocha as their "spiritual father" and called him "Dad".
She said that in late 2013, she had been in a games room at Coseyneuk House when the church leader had repeatedly "pinged" her underwear and grabbed and pinched her bottom.
When she later asked Masocha why he had done it, he told her that he had seen "demons and things that shouldn't be there" in her pants, and that he was clearing them away.

'Anointed hugs'

The deaconess, a 32-year-old mother-of-four, had visited Masocha's office for prayer while suffering from a stomach complaint, when he started touching her private parts.
She said: "I was so shocked. At that time I saw him as somebody who could never do any wrong, because that was what he used to teach us. He used to teach us his hugs were anointed."
When she told her husband, a devoted member of the church, he told her: "The Prophet is seeing something in your genitals that needs to be removed, so he was removing that."
She left her husband and the church shortly after members had tried to have her sectioned under the Mental Health Act.
Paramedics who they summoned to a service she was attending in England declined to act, concluding that the call had been made as an "act of public humiliation".
She called the church a "cult", and said she had been "brainwashed".

Masocha denied the allegations, with his defence claiming the deaconess was at the centre of a conspiracy to bring down the church because Masocha had postponed publication of a church magazine she had been working on.
The court heard that the church had grown in eight years from a meeting in Masocha's living room to an international organisation, with more than 2,000 members in the UK, USA, Canada and Africa.
The Strathclyde University PhD graduate was known by members by titles including "The Prophet", "The Apostle", "Man of God", and "High Commissioner".
A jury took 30 minutes to return majority guilty verdicts on the charges of sexually assaulting the deaconess and sexually touching the teenager.
The church leader was earlier found not guilty of two other charges, including one of engaging in sexual behaviour with a 13-year-old girl who retracted her claims that she had been induced to massage his half-naked body with oils.
Sheriff Kenneth McGowan deferred sentence until 19 May for reports, including an assessment of the risk Masocha poses to other women and girls.
Masocha's name was added to the sex offenders register.

Lord Janner will not face child sex abuse charges, CPS says

The decision not to prosecute Lord Janner has led to a furious reaction from campaigners for child abuse victims, as Tom Symonds reports
Courtesy of http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leicestershire-32329924?post_id=544010896_10152837311420897#_=_

Labour peer Lord Janner will not face child sex abuse charges because the severity of his dementia makes him unfit to stand trial, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has said.

The abuse allegations relate to residents in Leicestershire children's homes between 1970 and the 1980s.
Police condemned the CPS decision as "wrong", and the Labour Party has suspended the 86-year-old peer.
Lord Janner "is entirely innocent of any wrongdoing", his family has said.
A retired High Court judge will now review the CPS's handling of the case.

'Extremely disappointing'

More than a dozen individuals made allegations to police relating to Greville Janner, the CPS said.
The "core allegation" was that as MP for Leicester West at the time, Lord Janner befriended the manager of a children's care home to allow him access to children so he could "perpetrate serious sexual offences on children", the CPS said.
Leicestershire Police interviewed more than 2,000 people throughout the course of their investigation, and a "comprehensive file of evidence" was submitted to the CPS.

In a statement Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders said there was enough evidence to charge him with:

• Fourteen indecent assaults on a male under 16 between 1969 and 1988
• Two indecent assaults between 1984 and 1988
• Four counts of buggery of a male under 16 between 1972 and 1987
• Two counts of buggery between 1977 and 1988

Last year a former detective sergeant with Leicestershire Police, Mick Creedon - now chief constable of Derbyshire Police - told a national newspaper that in 1989 he was ordered not to arrest Lord Janner and not to search his home.

Leicestershire Police said it was "worried" about the impact of the CPS's decision.
The Assistant Chief Constable Roger Bannister said he believed the decision was "the wrong one" and it would do little to support and encourage victims of sexual abuse to come forward.
He said: "I am extremely worried about the impact the decision not to prosecute him will have on those people [who came forward].
"More widely I am worried about the message this decision sends out to others, both past and present, who have suffered and are suffering sexual abuse.
"We are exploring what possible legal avenues there may be to challenge this decision, and victims themselves have a right to review under a CPS procedure."

Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls has said Labour "acted swiftly and decisively" to suspend Lord Janner from the party following the CPS announcement.
He said the allegations were "very serious" but understood the CPS's decision.
Explaining its decision, the CPS said there is no treatment for Lord Janner's condition and there is no current or future risk of offending.
His condition is "rapidly becoming more severe" and requires continuous care both day and night, her statement said.
"His evidence could not be relied upon in court and he could not have any meaningful engagement with the court process, and the court would find it impossible to proceed."
Ms Saunders said the decision will be "extremely disappointing to complainants" and has written to all of them.
Last year the CPS announced it was considering evidence against Lord Janner as part of an inquiry into allegations of historical child abuse.
The investigation was linked to Frank Beck, who was found guilty of sexually and physically abusing more than 100 children in the 1970s and 1980s.
Beck, who ran children's homes in Leicestershire, was given five life prison sentences and died in jail.
In a statement Lord Janner's family described him as a "man of great integrity and high repute with a long and unblemished record of public service".
"As the Crown Prosecution Service indicated today, this decision does not mean or imply that any of the allegations that have been made are established or that Lord Janner is guilty of any offence," the statement said.
In 1991, Lord Janner made statements in Parliament asserting his innocence after a man claimed he had abused him.
He will remain a member of the House of Lords until his death or until he formally retires under reforms passed last year.
Retired High Court Judge Sir Richard Henriques will conduct an independent review into the CPS's decision making and how it handled the case, she said.

Disclaimer: Copyright of all newspaper clips  https://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/about/